>If the "scientific research" has identified the cause global warming, then there should be some sort of hypothesis that was tested.
>
>What was that hypothesis?
>
>And in testing that hypothesis, what sort of experimental controls were used?
>
>Fact: there is no testable hypothesis, no control experiment, and no scientific results regarding the causes of the changes we are currently seeing on a planet that has always been and always will be undergoing change.

I have a testable hypothesis, just you provide a spare Earth to try it on.

The experiment is actually lasting for a couple of centuries now. First with coal, now with oil. And they didn't even bother to posit a hypothesis, they just knew in advance they'll make money and apres nous, le deluge.