>>>>Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I found this today in my paper. I am sorry they say this.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2007/01/12/bnews/br09.txt
>>>
>>>After all the eulogies you guys who knew him lavished on him after the event, all I can say is that, regardless of whether he was suicidal or not, he was nothing but a sh*t to take his son with him.
>>
>>If that's what happened. I only met him a couple of times, and those times not really in depth, but it sure never occurred to me that he had any psychological problems. Others here know him better.
>>
>>I've heard it said that everyone at some point thinks or talks about suicide - most of us not seriously, of course, and I don't know how serious it was in his discussions with whomever, but I'd like to think that he was the same as the majority.
>>
>>To the best of my knowledge, he truly loved his son. It's hard for me to believe it was a murder/suicide. It is much easier for me to accept that his son fell and he tried to grab him and went over too, but, again, I can't know.
>
>If they both landed feet first... I can think of another plausible interpretation: Drew punished Brent for some reason. Brent jumped or fell and Drew jumped from the guilt. If he pushed Brent from a seated position, Brent would have turned head over heels, no?

You have to be a trained stunt man to control a fall. Too many factors are involved. It seems that the authorities were there and know what happened with absolute certainty. Otherwise it is only an opinion and I do not think that such an opinion should be allowed in official records.