You are correct - and we should doubt the "offocial" story too - no note - no witnesses - no liability claims against the park service.

>>Theories aside - the only fact we know is that a murder suicide ruling by the coroner, in which a parent is accused of murder and suicide, means that the insurance companies will not have to pay any benefits.
>
>Not necessarily true. The possibly relevant issues are:
>
>1) a murderer can't benefit from his crime--irrelevant here (and we don't even know whether there was insurance on Brent).
>
>2) exclusion on benefits in case of a suicide--most often, such exclusions are time-limited, so that someone contemplating suicide can't go out and get insurance that then pays off. We have no idea if that's relevant here.
>
>
>Tamar