>>>>So, what are your predictions?
>>>>
>>>>
? .f. or .t. or .f. and .f. or .f.
>>>>? .f. or .f. or .t. and .f. or .f.
>>>
>>>True and False
>>
>>We reasoned from left to right.
>>
>>Our initial reasoning for the 1st one was:
>>step 1) false or true = true
>>step 2) true or false = true
>>step 3) true and false = false
>>step 4) false or false = FALSE
>>
>>Our initial reasoning for the 2nd one was:
>>step 1) false or false = false
>>step 2) false or true = true
>>step 3) true and false = false
>>step 4) false or false = FALSE
>>
>>We now know we were wrong and why. But does anybody here (except Sergey, who obviously appears to know why) know why?
>
>Only if we would read if right to left.
What do you mean?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
