>Now I understand why you are fighting this, they presented you with $30,000 bill for back taxes.

That is one part of it. This has been triggered when they sent the ruling. Because of all the noise the ruling has created, which has been launched after a Canadian member complained about an undesired tax, which was really insulting for me because I knew it was ok to tax canadiens, the CRA decided to investigate. So, they then said that because a ruling is now effective, that this ruling should now be back related up to the time Level Extreme started to operate the service. So, they calculated that the first year of operation should have taxed international customers. So, not only did they calculate that I have to pay them money, but they also have retained several thousands that they owe me for the last quarter. Because, when you deal with 90% of your income from the international market, it means that, in most cases, you will have more tax paid on expenses than the tax you are collecting. In that case, the government reimburse you for the difference. So, that was extremely frustrated. The second part is that from that point, the company was jeopardized because the tax is now applicable to international customers and we have to fight to drop that as well.