I know. But if he were to say something like "OK, maybe I was out of line," I would miss it!

Change of subject (and not a moment too soon, right?). Here is something you may find amusing. The other day I was doing some minor grumbling about the firewall here at work. I was clicking through the list of VFP blogs and couldn't figure out why some were allowed and others were blocked. The funniest blocked one was yours -- "Forbidden Category: Games" <g>.

>One can always envoke the twit filter.
>
>>Your listening skills appear a bit rusty. A number of people have objected to your posts in the "Ruling on Mr. Speedie's death" thread, with varying degrees of irritation / outrage. Your only reaction seems be be starting a new thread with no hint of contrition and more of the same political and conspiracy mumbo jumbo. Terrific.
>>
>>Reacting to only a couple of the "points" in your latest post ---
>>
>>> You guys now straddle the fence on Drew. You are saying on one hand, that the coronor did not conspire with the state and corporate interests to make a finding that Drew murdered his child. Yet, on the other, you commiserate Drew as being a wonderful human being. Do you see the hypocrisy?
>>>
>>
>>No, I don't. Most of those who have posted have said they don't agree with the coroner's finding. That doesn't mean there was a conspiracy. IMO the coroner just got it wrong, leaping to judgement with insufficient evidence.
>>
>>> From what I have read in Drew's "wake" thread, most of us think he is a child murderer.
>>>
>>
>>Huh? We do? Where did you get that from?
>>
>>Some of the things you say surely test my commitment to free speech.
>>
>>Blather on if you feel the need, old sport. Just understand that you are gaining neither respect nor friends.