>Evan and all, put aside the manner in which Terry has presented his point which is arguably not the best method. Instead focus on the point he is trying to make. You must conclude one of three things from the coroners report (or rather from the article link that was posted about the coroners conclusions):
>
>1) The coroner is lying on purpose.
>
>2) The coroner has reached an incorrect conclusion.
>
>3) Drew did what the coroner has claimed he did.
>
>Terry's point => everyone who believes either 1 or 2 should immediately contact the coroner and make the appropiate complaints and insist on a re-examination of all the facts including the numerous people here who could vouch for Drew's character and love for his son.

That is what I was thinking as well when I got involved in this thread, but as Tracy pointed out to me; It is private/very painfull matter so decision about pursuing public action for reexamination of the case etc should be left to his wife/family.

However, I was anticipating way louder response/(re)action and that was
kind of absent. Now after thread became 'disgrace', not much can be done to revert that even if it is deleted. Conviniently crucifying TerryT is not answer nor solution, can we do better then (just) that ?

It IS 1 or 2.