>>IOW, I was glad when this limited editing was introduced. It helps me fix my own errors before too many people see them, probably saving us all from unnecessary subthreads arising from that. Of course, just like any other software feature, it can be used in ways not initially intended. So let's not go overboard and ask for prohibition of something just because a few misuse it.
>
>I fully agree.

Um... my message had an update while you were answering (I sort of expected this to happen - just to show to Kevin that he's partially right, these things do happen, but not necessarily with bad intent), like this:

[update :)] If UT is keeping previous versions, maybe it would be a good idea to give us an ability to view previous versions of the message, or at least to have an "updated" indicator somewhere in the message header.