lol

>Not according to my 15yr old daughter. A 'cracker' is a common term in school (in the South) and is something (someone) entirely different... :o)
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>I'm of opinion that it's a shame that Refox is allowed to exist in the upper world. And it is our community that lets this endure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What rubbish. To attack and badger Refox is wrong and misses the point entirely. You should rather attack the perpetrator. Cracking and stealing peoples property (eg source code) is the problem. Not what tools they use to carry out the crime. Refox is not your problem, crackers are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do you think if Refox was gone you would be safe? (Have you heard of UnFoxAll?). There will always be tools which will have a double-edge. We don't ban tools just because they could be put to good and bad uses. Then you may as well ban the Internet entirely because cyber-crimes commited over the Internet is now a multi-billion dollar business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There is a big difference between UnFoxAll and Refox though. UnFoxAll doesn't market their software as a tool you can buy to protect you from itself (AKA Refox's "branding" - which is also hackable).
>>>>>
>>>>>Everything is hackable :)
>>>>
>>>>Does this mean we should let hackers have it easier with tools like ReFox?
>>>
>>>
>>>Hackers? Let's call them what they are: thieves.
>>
>>Actually this would be a cracker, not a hacker.