>>>>Try with SYS(1104) in between.
>>>
>>>So what?
>>
>>To make it slow again. <g>
>
>but users want it fast, that was my point.
>Kidding aside, 'all words' table seems to be a good thing. Agreed?

I got a speedup from a couple of minutes down to a few seconds after introducing an "all words" table. The size of the table is about 30000 records, and the size of the fpt is about 120M.