I'm not Mike, but that's another story.
I didn't mean to put Foley in with situations that didn't happen until the dems took over. But I do think that the repub leaders of Congress moved very slowly until the situation had already reached boiling point and they were forced to move.
Obviously the discussions of faulty intelligence have been going on for quite sometime also. My point was that I think it's been pretty well proven that the administration knowingly used faulty information, and according to some help fabricate where necessary. So to say the president was relying on faulty information is incorrect.
He got the american people to rely on faulty information is more closer to the truth.
>SNIP
>>until the dems took over congress there was a remarkable silence about both these.
>
>Hi Mike,
>
>You can't rewrite history. Foley resigned in September. The Democrats taking over Congress had nothing to do with it.
>
>The verbal discussion and publication of the faulty intelligence and Bush's abuse of civil rights has been going on for a LONG time. All very long before the Dem's took over congress.
(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush