>>>I do have (really have) a cousin of mine that still contests that the man never step to the moon. it was all U.S. propaganda..
>>
>>That is soo stupid it does not even bear answering. Anyway, you already have a good debunking link given in this thread done by Phil Plait (The Bad Astronomner). Penn and Teller also debunked it on TV long ago in their Bullsh!t show (available on DVD).
>
>she (my cosin) is questioning something really similar as yours.. something that she just prefer to stay out.. only by the preference to don't accept the evidences.. and don't accept any related witness.. or prove of the fact..
>
>Yours preferences is to say: "Ohh God.. they will not go to deceive me.."


Wrong. I am a skeptic by nature. I do question anything I read/see on the news. It is not true just because it's on a book or a newspaper. That said, there are plenty of direct and indirect evidence, plus a modicum of common sense and some experience to conclude it was not a hoax. In science there is a principle called "Occam's Razor" which basically says that of several possible expalantions start with the simplest. The simplest, believe it or not, is that there were moon landings. It is so unbelievable complex to trick the people (and the Soviets at the same time) about such a thing for so long that it would not work and it in itself would strecth credibility. This Occam's principle is somewhat akin to the layman's world "KISS Principle".