>>2. the big separation on the production of gosphel books.. some of them was created with great geologic separation and some with 10 years.. the rich of details and the description of the dialogues are perfect and match for complete.
>
>Come again? They differ and contradict each other plenty.

exactly where?? give me an example..
>
>
>>3. On some roman historic documents... among roman historians, Tacitus (annals 15,44) write about the christian movement start with Jesus, wich was sentenced to death by Pontius Pilate. Suetonius (Claudius 25,4) consultation the expulsion of jews of Rome because of a riot instigated for one " Chrestus " on ANOUNCE c. 48,. Pliny the newest (Epistles 10,96), writing to emperor Trajan, says that some christians sing a hymn to Christ because God is propaganda anti christian, another reference is on Talmud babylonian says that Jeshu ha - Nocri was a fake prophet that it was hung in a Passover for fake teaching. The evidence of historian Josephus is problematical. Recounts (antiquities 20,9,1) the James James, " the brother of Jesus called the Christ, " on ANOUNCE 62.
>
>You are quoting the Bible again. You can't prove a circular point. IOW you can't use the Bible to prove the Bible.

No.. I am quoting historic documents available at italy and french museums..
>
>
>
>>6. on thousand of historic books ..with geological references and timeline match events on history..
>You keep talking about Geology. History and Geology are not as related as you seem to think. They are two different disciplines.

even still seen your attempt to destroy my reputation on public, as attempt to reveal "your reasons". I'll still continue here disposal to clarify any doubts. And, still having for you my best fellowship..

IMO, This is the first evidence that your heart it is about to be changed.. But, let's keep focused.. Proving if I am dummy (or not) will not destroy any one that Jesus Christ is God..