Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
The Trillion Dollar War
Message
De
08/02/2007 12:18:39
 
 
À
08/02/2007 12:06:07
Dragan Nedeljkovich
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01192386
Message ID:
01193714
Vues:
14
>>>>>>>I meant, if the bible is 100% accurate, and if I remember correctly, it says that the god it describes has created human beings. The question is, exactly how many did he create?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>all of us are creature of God.. the nature, animals is also..
>>>>>
>>>>>That's indirectly - or else we wouldn't have reproductive organs. It wouldn't be "go out and multiply", it would be "go out and I'll keep making more of you".
>>>>>
>>>>>The question is, exactly how many did he create?
>>>>
>>>>All that you can see, touch, etc.. has a single one creator.. If you need a number.. Well, give some days to use my excel to sum all world census..<g>
>>>
>>>OK, so if people all have one creator, why were they created capable of sex?
>>
>>and a little more.. how can even that sex be so goooood?<g>
>>
>>now serious.. when we talk about bible we think that we talk only about a religious book.. the fact is: bible itis a religious book.. And also, social, economical, of laws, history, etc..
>>
>>It is primarily a book of principles of epthic..
>>
>>So, what principles control the nature.. gravity, action and reaction, etc.. All very well described by the men's phisic, quimic, etc.. A principle of animals/man creation was all about sexual/nonsexual "procreation".. By the etmology of the word we see the prefix PRO as the meaning of partner..
>>
>>We're partners of who??
>
>OK, I got the message. You're just another guy who inserts his religious views into any chatter thread at random, but can't come around to answer the same question I asked Doug Dodge and Howard Bennett before. IOW, no different. Actually, different at this randomness - DD wouldn't start with his biblical meanderings until the subject of the thread came close, and Howie didn't go off unprovoked (except once or twice in the beginning, or else we wouldn't even know he's The Howie). You really feel free to start harping on the subject at any time. I can only presume you have this urge to share your point of view, your weltanschauung, because you somehow imagine you hold the keys to the truth and want to make us all happy by using them to unlock... your truth.
>
>By their own definition, all brands of Christianity share this sin of hubris: they all claim to be holders of the truth, while all the others (other religions, other brands of Christianity and nonbelievers alike) are wrong. Add to that the monopolistic first commandment and the tendency to work on their own expansion by taking people away from other groups, and you may begin to understand why I don't like it at all, and will speak up whenever I feel that my spirituality is under attack.

Non-believers are wrong by a very practical reason: they live in a glass house and got too many stones on hand.
Edward Pikman
Independent Consultant
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform