Oh I see. You are right of course. I tend to forget what perception lurkers may have.... My bad!





>No problem at all. I understand very clear that both you and Terry would never say such things. It was more of general observation regarding some other post(er)s.
>
>>I am doing NO SUCH THING and I am pretty sure Terry knows that. My reponse is in direct response to Terry's comment on England saving our butts in Afghanistan and Iraq - while it is appreciated and is definitely in support of the U.S. and VERY CRITICAL for political purposes, it is not the same type of mission effect as the U.S. joining WWII. England is NOT 'saving our butts.' That is fairly obvious. Did you read the last three messages mine was in line with? I think you are taking it out of context.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>SNIP
>>>>>
>>>>>We're doing that in Iraq and Afghanistan! :-)
>>>>
>>>>I will not argue whether or not England is participating in Iraq and Afghanistan. England has been our ally in all we do good, and almost all we do bad. However, England is NOT saving the butts of the U.S. in either place. That is not a truthful comparison to the U.S.' role in WWII.
>>>
>>>England played a honorable role in WWII, probably the most honorable. Obviously, USA provided help to them, but it's not the reason to make ethical accusations. It was 60 years ago after all, so only blatant cases of ingratitude showed by some other countries/persons should cause this reaction.