>>>>What kind of stuff did I not prove to you? Try to be specific..
>>>
>>>I somehow don't see how proving (i.e. use of logic) can go together with faith (i.e. believing despite impossibility of proof, or despite of proof of the contrary) can go together. So I don't expect you to prove anything. Once we get into proving, we start employing logic, and then I ask the same question again, the one you refused to answer directly, and we go next circle.
>>
>>in other words.. it is a case of don't acception..
>>
>>"Me, Dragan.. I am total inflexible about Christian questions."
>
>I've accepted the fact that faith defies logic and vice versa. I sometimes forget that, and forget that "prove" may mean quite different things to you and me.
>
>You can prove things in science, and you can try to prove things observed in human behavior. But in the latter case, human behavior is too complex, so you never know if there's yet another important factor that wasn't included, and which may offer a different explanation. So for the most part, all scientific approach to human behavior is partial - which IMO includes sociology, psychology, economy, politics, demographics etc.
>
>So if I mentioned anywhere that I expected you to prove anything, my apologies. Simple slip of the mind.
>
Hehe.. apologies full accepted.. you're welcome<g>

Some bible's teacher of our church, used to use an explanation very simple:

If to believe:

Do I need to see.. It is not faith.. but vision!!

Do I need to hear.. It is not faith.. but hearing!!

Do I need to touch.. to smell.. to taste.. It will be different human senses!!

The only exercise of faith is about something that I can't see, touch, hear, smell or taste..

"Now to him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us, Ephesians 3:20