No it does not. You did'nt read it.

>I know that but that is the foundation it preposes and builds on.
>
>>Did you actually bother to read the entire article before labelling it "crap"? Its not about Bush per se.
>>
>>>It's not black or white. Bush not GOOD Bush not BAD; but bashing Bush and his policies just because he's Bush is silly.
>>>
>>>>I don't think the article was particularly about Bush per se but rather about militarism in general. But I agree with your approach; Bush GOOD Bush GOOD. There, now we all are much the wiser.
>>>>
>><snip>