>Well I read it that way, and that was how it was explained in the MSDN Event I attended this week. It was verbalized as it can exist on ANY machine but ONLY on ONE machine at a time.
That's good to hear.
It suggests that uninstall also 'de-registers' the copy. I hope there's no problem when a system flat-out broke and there was no way to de-register it first.
>
>
>
>>>No, as long as it is uninstalled, it can be reinstalled on another device. It can only reside on one device at a time though. I don't see how you can interpret it to mean that it would be the end of line for you if your hardware failed...
>>
>>I see. So you're reading this as you may do that as often as you like.
>>I was reading it literally... allowed to do it once.
>>
>>I like your interpretation - as long as Microsoft's lawyers do too. < s >
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>The VISTA license has been changed:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%20Vista_Home%20Basic_English_2cd69850-7680-4987-8b1e-59a3d405c074.pdf>>>>>
>>>>>15. REASSIGN TO ANOTHER DEVICE.
>>>>>a. Software Other than Windows Anytime Upgrade. You may uninstall the software and
>>>>>install it on another device for your use. You may not do so to share this license between
>>>>>devices.
>>>>>
>>>>>(This was actually discussed at the MSDN Vista event I attended)
>>>>
>>>>So it does look like it is restricted to a SINGLE other system. Last I heard "another" means 'one other', not 'lots of other'.
>>>>
>>>>So my recent troubles with my other system, where I replaced the motherboard to get it working, would be "another device" under the Vista license. At least that's how it reads to me. And that would be the end-of-the-line for that license that I bought!!! My next failure would also require a new license.
>>>>
>>>>And I think WilliamK is wrong in his interpretation of "OEM" being for that system and only that system. I had to re-install XP with the new motherboard (the shop had installed their own on my C: while diagnosing my problems (with my permission)) and I had no trouble "activating" it after doing so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>By the same token, I suspect many 'techs' couldn't care less and wouldn't worry about such provisions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My understanding is that there is an OEM version and a non-OEM(can't think of the name off the top of my head) version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This has been the case for a long time re: OEM editions of MS software. Whether they have changed license terminology recently I do not know, but OEM software is licensed to be used on the original system it is installed on (period). That is why it costs around 50% of full license version. If there is a provision that says that OEM can be used on a successor system or something like that, that is an improvement in the terms AFAIK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If Microsoft is expected to maintain software as entitlement style programs (keep patching/stocking/supporting/maintaining on the books forever) as has been suggested, then they need to change their licensing to more of a rental or tax agreement where the customer pays continuously for use.
