>>>the fact of, me(*) to certify with my own life the existence of a cure by the absorbment of all the bible's knowledges and acception of a Savior/Lord (described there)..
>>>
>>>Ask to any lawyer.. in any court, of occidental countries, it is a fact accepted as circumstancial prove.. But prove.. And, if more than one witness and depending on the level of envolviment, it will be full enough to make the judge/juries decide about the lawsuit.
>>
>>Aren't you forgetting the other side of the coin, and all the witnesses who have different experiences? Sure, if the judge hears witnesses from only one side, then you are right, but in a real court of law, there is usually an opposing position. Then it becomes a little less black and white.
>>
>Hehe, this is not our point.. we are not talking about the verídict. we are talking about the acceptions of me (and my facts) be accepted as prove.
>
>at this court everyone does its own veridict..

What court? You said "Ask any lawyer.. in any court, of occidental countries". There is no such thing as "your facts". Facts are facts. In a court of law you muyst prove them. Belief in magical cures is not a fact. There is one verdict in a court of law, not "everyone does its own veridict".