Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Information générale
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Versions des environnements
>>>To me, getPem() returning an object is equally non-obvious as a cryptic macro expansion. And if we assign this object to a properly prefixed local variable, it's even more readable than a macro or an eval() call.
>>>
>>>But then, de gustibus non est disputandum.
>>
>>Taste should never be as important as engineering. :)
>
>"Less obvious" tastes like having a taste... towards "I like this better because I'm used to it". For me, getpem() is pretty much a straight system call, while eval() or a macro are workarounds.
Dragan
You've convinced me. I take back my statement. It should not be avoided, just properly documented.
MS should document that GETPEM will return any contained object and not just PEMs. As long as variables are named appropriately GetPEM should be fine.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement