>>>
>>>I don't see any advantage - VFP would still be running on XP, while XP would be hosted in a VM.
>>>
>>>Microsoft would still require you to buy a copy of XP to do this.
>>
>>And you would be running slower than VFP on a native XP installation.
>
>But you WOULD be running, rather than not at all. ($$$$$$ from Open Source users).
Sure, but after they buy the XP license and enough hardware to run acceptably the savings may not materialize or may not be much anyway..
____________________________________
Don't Tread on Me
Overthrow the federal government NOW!
____________________________________