>>>>Soykan,
>>>>
>>>>>would you like to share with me your caBase class ? :)
>>>>
>>>>My CA classes will be included in an article that I will post sometime soon, but the current version needs some cleanup -- it's very project-specific at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>I'll notify you here and by email when it is available for download (probably within a few weeks).
>>>
>>>I see nobody defended SPT in this thread. It seems a bit unfair, after all data processing is supposed to be done on server if possible.
>>
>>I use SPT all the time. I don't agree with everything being done on the server if possible. That's like saying a city should have a subway and no other vehicles.
>
>I said 'data processing'. Anyway, it's encouraging to see that we use the same things (i mean SPT).

SPT here too - and yes, I like to throw as much of record processing to be done serverside, whenever that's simpler, faster, cheaper (in terms of wire melt :). In rare cases, I may just pull a couple of raw cursors from the server and finish them off VFP side, because the TSQL language may be short on some features I need, and VFP has them.

As usual, the universal answer is "it depends" :).