Wouldn't it be in Aramaic? :o) I guess that means it is all a hoax then.. Well shoot... :o) *G*



>>If the DNA doesn't connect to Jesus, then all they've 'proved' is that two people who they postulate were Jesus and Mary (their translationsof the ossuaries, not everyone's) had a child. Also, if not brother and sister, then why necessarily 'husband and wife'? Because they had a child?
>>
>>If the resurrection is true, then there would be no bones belonging to Jesus to find, regardless where it may have happened. No? After resurrection he ascended, didn't he? Maybe I have it wrong, but I think, according to the gospels, he'd have ultimately left no body parts behind.
>
>
>Bingo.
>
>I think on the bottom they found an inscription in latin (written by Asterix) "I thee wed..."