>>>>Think (as a sample) here at UT.. Where is the day, that Alex, Dragan, Claudio, Hilmar, Tracy, etc. will have same opinion for every subject.. Never!! We're specials, unique.. I like soda, Dragan loves Coke.. The simple logic is: "One day we will learn to respect each other and not think the side opossite to yours is the dirty one or the stupidy one.."
>>>>
>>>>This is matureness !!
>>>
>>>I don't understand "unity" as all having the same opinion. The idea is, precisely, respecting each other.
>>
>>Ok, maybe I miss something here.. This is what I meant by the word: Tolerance..
>
>
>We value your opinion. The question Tracy asked is why you seem to know and quote only one book and can't seem to be able to discuss and understand other points of view. You can't accept that we, as software developers, must think logically to be able to dissect a problem and translate it to computer code, yet you seem to always fall into the logical fallacy of circular proof: i.e. using the Bible to explain and analyze the Bible.

Maybe you got all talk by the middle.. Tracy post a letter where the message is about the bible is the reference of something with wrong, bad or not acceptable messages..

So, I said that any text can't be used in pieces and small elements.. to not commit a sin against literature.. this is what we know as take the text from the context.. on any text/thesis the argument is a set of:
. Proposal
. Analysis of the proposal or thesis
. Formularization of arguments
. Conclusion

And other great sin against any historic literature is about the don't use of exegesis..
>
>Also, getting an easy way out by saying "exegesis" at every corner does not cut it. Tracy asked you specific questions of specific passages (albeit funny ones). You gave her a non-answer.
>
albeit?? sorry.. I'm not sure what it means.. please, could you point me here what of those are you talkin about?

>Do you accept the Bible whole or do you pick and choose what parts you do not like? It is after all the word of God and it is the infallible truth, isn't it? (not to me, but it seems it is to you).

funny one.. But, before to put my own person under questioning, try to be a little specific on the mentioned questions.. Even if you prove to anyone here something against my reputation.. You still to continue running on that empty journey against christianity.. on that weird *philosophy* of "Thanks God, I'm atheist!!"..

Let's get back to the focus..

Some thread ago you promisse here that you will post where the bible is incoherent.. If I recall fine you use two (or tree) completely coherent texts.. Where are "those" incoherent ones??

you have for you now all of our attentions to show.. Take my challenge and show us boy!! But please, don't murder literature!!