Bush and Exxon are in public relation business so they have to look more flexible than ordinary web posters. Certainly, less pollution is good, but when carbon dioxide is called a pollutant the question is what's the next? By this 'scientific' appoarch anything or anyone could be called a pollutant.

>John,
>
>Even Bush and Mobile/Exxon have backed away from that position! But we should take your word for this over the vast majority of scientist. At any rate, producing less pollution and using renewable resources and trying to improve things for the next generation are worthy goals, regardless.
>
>Bob
>
>>>Hello Terry
>>>
>>>I agree it's hypocritical, but at least he is bringing attention to the problem while others hope it just goes away quietly (like the Iraq Mess :)
>>>
>>>Bob
>>
>>Assuming there is a problem. Global warming is junk science to garner political attention for research grants/money.