I'm very much looking forward to this prg on TV tomorrow:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=440049&in_page_id=1965
...
>>(see I can point to graphs also ;)
>>
>>
>>where the smaller grapg shows 400K of history, look at the inset for the last couple of years, yes I think it is different....
>
>and I disagree, I wasn't just 'pointing' to graphs. I was trying to make the point that the warming we see now is could very well be part of a natural cycle that has repeated many times during the earth's history. What bothers me is that anyone who dares to differ with the current paradigm is automatically a stooge of big oil.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>You really didn't answer my question, Do you honestly see any difference between 'today' and the peaks 130,000, 240,000 and 330,000 years ago? Those dramatic rises in CO2 concentrations were in no way related to industrial pollution. From the link you pointed to:
>>>