http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Iran/index.htmlor more likely:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8354.htm>>In case of bombing Tehran, the pro-bombing argument that it will prevent that the Iranians can further develop a bomb is probably true and therefore cannot really be undermined. So, forget that one, or admit it's probably true.
>
>Pro-bombing arguments are simply - bananas. Just like WMD was in case of Iraq. Iran is NOT the threat. I don't believe they can hit USA with any missile. I don't know of any Iran's plane carriers cruising Caribean waters, or is there such thing ?
>
>Iran is UNDER threat. Serious one at that. They live in hostile environment,
>on top of it you have US carriers cruising Gulf as we speak.
>
>All that is *needed* is that 'Catalyzing event'.
>And you know how it goes, Sh*t happens when you liiiiist expect it...
>
>I just wonder what is gonna be this time.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
