>>I was just replying to Mike, not dealing with your complex problem <g> And I haven't tested yet in VFP what Mike wants to test, not that I have done any of my own work today...
>
>Well, you said "tried... ...in a form"... and that's where my reply was heading.
>
>And now it's not complicated anymore :).

Good for you! <g>

One shot - and two hares <g> (or what is the English idiom?)