There are always people, especially if you talk about 'few survivors' who would like to kill you just for fun, or some other reason that's doesn't merit 'why' question.There is no defence against them, except to remove the incentive for any population to harbor them.
By the way, I disagree that military ways are obsolete. Iraq situation (i believe that would be your example) is not a military fault. It is an illustration what happens when army (after winning the war) is invited to perform police (or any other non-related) functions.I didn't say military ways, I said big guns and big batallions as a recipe for "victory". I agree there is an important role for military along the lines of Roosevelt's "speak softly and carry a big stick". But things have changed and "armies" don't line up with rifles for a slugfest anymore. They seek jobs in airports, hospitals, morgues and wait for the perfect moment.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1