>>>In case of bombing Tehran, the pro-bombing argument that it will prevent that the Iranians can further develop a bomb is probably true and therefore cannot really be undermined. So, forget that one, or admit it's probably true.
>>
>>Pro-bombing arguments are simply - bananas. Just like WMD was in case of Iraq. Iran is NOT the threat. I don't believe they can hit USA with any missile. I don't know of any Iran's plane carriers cruising Caribean waters, or is there such thing ?
>>
>>Iran is UNDER threat. Serious one at that. They live in hostile environment,
>>on top of it you have US carriers cruising Gulf as we speak.
>>
>>All that is *needed* is that 'Catalyzing event'.
>>And you know how it goes, Sh*t happens when you liiiiist expect it...
>>
>>I just wonder what is gonna be this time.
>
>When sh*t doesn't happen, it is invented to suit the need. Bullsh*t is still sh*t, and it has happened several times in history.

Are you talking about reacent history ?
<vbg>