>>>>>There was a sequel to the book. I believe it was called Logan's World that followed Logan and Jessica on their life outside the city.
>>>>
>>>>huh,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And, as an FYI, the city where I grew up, Logan, Utah, for many years had a marathon they called Logan's Run....until the movie company threatened them with copyright infringement. The city organizers could probably have won the lawsuit, but it would have cost lots of money.
>>>>
>>>>Typical
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Warner Brothers was working on a remake of the movie, but shelved it late last year.
>>>>
>>>>I think I heard about that. But it could not have been as bad as the remake of Planet Of The Apes.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I've seen the movie when I was young. I also read he book and it had a completely different plot. It was a toss-up which was dumber.
>>>
>>>I've said it before and I'll say it again: Why, with SO MANY good stories around, do they KEEP remaking old movies, just cos the old'n was successful? ("The Four Feathers" has been a major film 7 times so I once read). That ridiculous yarn "King Kong" has been a major release 3 times!
>>
>>
>>Yes, because the old one was successful. The movies are an expensive business and studios / producers look for every shortcut they can find. Notice it's called the movie business and not the movie pageant, the movie philanthropy, etc. And as long as remakes make money this will continue. In this we bear at least as much guilt as the moviemakers. Lots of people just want what they've had before again.
>>
>>It isn't always a disaster. "The Departed" was a remake of a Korean movie. (Incorrectly referred to as a Japanese movie at the Academy Awards).
>
>For my take on all that I refer you to my message to Sam: Message #201979


I clicked that link and got a John Peterson post from 1999. LOL