>I don't dispute that. In fact, I think 'credits' are about the stupidest concept yet devised in the ecosystem debate. I don't even care where the credits come from. The mere idea of credits is counter-productive.
>
>Insofar as the global warming debate itself is concerned, all I'm saying is that if they're only doing it to get research funding is a valid argument, then so must be they're only doing it because they're getting funding from the oil etc, interests.
>
If you noticed 'big oil' is not the main critic of global warming theory. They are preparing to receive big chunk of government programs in regard to this concept.