Hi,
I agree with most things that were said in the show. I must admit the African angle was different.

The main thing that is of concern to me at the moment is that, one of the leading proponents of the "Man Made GW Set" has put forward a proposal to sequest the atmospheric CO2 into the ocean by simulating algae growth in the oceans on a wide scale basis, this would have catastrophic consequences on the rainmaking process.

We all are aware of how exponential processes can get out of hand when over stimulated i.e. red tides, blue green algae etc.

I just keep trying to bring some sanity back into the argument.

The good point made in the show was the one about the fact that many jobs ride on "Man Made GW" and he quoted that his local council had appointed a "Global Warming Officier", our local council had recently done the same, this is amazing how far the "Inconvenient Lie" has spread.



>Hi
>
>Yes, I agree with you on the main points, but that's not what I asked really. What I wanted to know was if the show corrresponded with your skeptical attitude to man-made GW. I think you've long been a GW debunker on the UT.
>
>>Hi,
>>The main points to be noted are:
>>
>>1. The Natural Temperature Fluctuation Cycles drive the CO2 levels in the atmosphere, not the other way round. That is the Real "Inconvenient Truth/Lie".
>>2. The sun drives the whole process, by various means, some processes are not fully understood. i.e. cosmic cloud seeding.
>>3. The oceans are the great regulator, and exhibit great thermal latency. i.e. approx 800 years.
>>4. The thermal and greenhouse gas levels that man produces is insignificant compared to what is produced by nature.
>>5. Greenpeace isn't now, what it was in it's inception.
>>
>>As a footnote, the actual process of how the whole system works is far more complex than anything put forward todate i.e. the primary driving force is the quanta, and it's effects aren't fully understood.
>>
>>Also the energy levels that the quanta can produce in this process are immense, and make what we are doing fail into insignificance.
>>
>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>> As I have said previously the numbers in the models that predict "Man Made Global Warming" just don't add up, whereas beating the "Man Made Global Warming" drum to supplement one's funding efforts dose make sense.
>>>>
>>>>>Google video has the documentary.
>>>>>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9005566792811497638&q=the+great+swindle
>>>
>>>So what did you think of it all, Neil?