>> Compiling to the CLR always was going to be difficult for VFP's language structure, but it would have been possible. And, IMHPO, desirable. Unfortunately, only a handful of people (Rick and Kevin for instance, if I remember correctly) shared that opinion though.
>
>But to have a VFP-like .NET language (ala VB.NET) would have been doable.

Exactly!

Perhaps the usefulness can be questioned. And there were difficulties. But I thought it would be doable. I understand why it never happened though...


Markus