Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hi Rakesh
Well designed VFP is completely different from well designed FPD. The converters do what all meat grinders do. If you put in fantastic FPD t-bone, you will not get fantastic Prime Rib VFP. You will get hamburger. :)
If you've chosen VFP because you used to use FPD2.6 you have over-estimated the amount of code you can reuse. VFP is sufficiently different from FPD that you should already have been considering other tools.
>Hi,
>
>Just a few months back I have been learing VFP for rewriting our Accounting software in VFP. We have not released any software yet. ( it's long way off target, due to minor improvements/features in DOS app. ) After reading all the messages about no new VFP core development from Microsoft, we have to decide if we should continue with VFP or choose some other platform.
>
>Some of our concerns are :
>
>If an OS is relased in 2016, will VFP core be modified. Similar to SP2 being released for Vista ? or will virtualization solve the problem.
>
>We have lot of code which can just be used in VFP like Inventory updation, accounts updation, year end processing, reports ( about 400 FRX's, which print to a DMP ).
>
>You viewpoints will hightly appreciated.
>
>Rakesh
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement