John Baird
Coatesville, Pennsylvania, United States
>Dorin,
>
>I do know of SQL Server Compact Edition {and have posted before about its (current) lack of stored procedures ;-) } and agree it is a suitable replacement for dbfs. But it still doesn't come close to VFP's persistent auto-disk-spanning resultsets. My understanding was that MS saw this as a priority for Linq. There are posts to this effect from MS many months back.
John,
I don't mean to sound antagonistic, but why do you have this need for "auto-disk-spanning resultsets". We deal with 500,000 record cursors all the time and have never had the need to span disks. I'm at a loss here to understand this. Can you shed some light?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only