>>Why don't YOU let him speak for himself. You are the one implying things - I just stated the fact that he never said it.
>
>Well, he has certainly spoken. You're clearly trying to instigate something here, and you seem to be sucessful. Happy?

I wasn't trying to instigate anything. I was pointing out a fact that because an organization migrates away from VFP, that it isn't always because of the anti-hype that MS is providing. You assumed that from his post, and I said that he didn't say it.