Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Serious consequences, but for who?
Message
From
19/03/2007 12:55:28
 
 
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Environment versions
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01204965
Message ID:
01205611
Views:
34
>I think you are confusing things here. Criteria differ for IT companies as compared to othertype companies. An (hypothethical or not) othertype company, possibly a customer of the IT company or a company with a VFP IT department and several other-language departments, has decided in the past to do development of a set of applications with VFP. And in all past years they were able to upgrade those applications. And now they feel forced to have those applications rewritten entirely. Such a company doesn't necessarilly have a management problem. They have a problem due to a decision that another company (MS) made. They have been trusting MS too much a number (2, 5, 10) of years ago. They will feel relief for the fact that their other applications have not been built in VFP, often because they refused to listen to VFP adepts.

I don't think so. Most of my work for the last 20 years has been around software projects for companies out of the IT industry. For most of them, change between platforms and tools is frequent and taken for granted.

In the accounting and administrative area, many companies got applications written in VB, for example. They had been changing the applications quite often between versions (and that wasn't like VFP plain recompiles, believe me), including changing data access from RDO to DAO to ADO, and so on. They changed their VB windows-based apps to ASP web sites, then -in many cases- back to windows as they couldn't meet their final goals, and so on...

Something quite like that happened in the Java environment, with some important changes coming in every version, and with people going to EJBs, then back to POJOs when EJB got too much, from JDBC to Hibernate or other ORMs, from applets to servlets to JSP, and so on...

You probably don't want to know about the people who choose Delphi. They even experience the whole company behind the product changing its name back and forth...

No single vendor can guarantee stability. VFP was able to keep an incredible level of backward compatibility during the last 20 years and will keep going on for some 10 or 20 more, surely. But this is NOT something usual in the IT industry, and it has a big drawback, too, and it is that there is a lot of people who still code with VFP 9 in the same way that 20 years ago, even when the tool is very up-to-date.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform