>>The name and the idea sounds good, let's hope MS does not send an "ET GO HOME" message <g>
>>
>>>Maybe others, reading this thread, can expand or comment on the idea of ET (the whole word is too long, so I propose the shorthand ET :-) taking VFP further beyond version 9.
>>>
>>>Maybe you (ET) don't know still, which is also a perfectly sound answer. But I (and maybe others too) am curious about your (present and future) position.
>
>It won't be legal for them to release a Visual FoxPro 10 product, but there seems to be no problem in them releasing the VFP Compiler and Extender. They can, of course, come up with more features in their compiler, as they intend to do, indeed.
>
>Just in case someone didn't notice, I did an interview with Samuel David which is in the latest issue of UT Magazine:
>
http://www.utmag.com/ViewPageArticle.aspx?Session=4E7273535366646F6757513D20454E4B75793765742F2B33546D664B61366B497A4B773D3DYes I noticed, and have read it. It was a good interview, with good questions. Thanks.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
