>>The name and the idea sounds good, let's hope MS does not send an "ET GO HOME" message <g>
>>
>>>Maybe others, reading this thread, can expand or comment on the idea of ET (the whole word is too long, so I propose the shorthand ET :-) taking VFP further beyond version 9.
>>>
>>>Maybe you (ET) don't know still, which is also a perfectly sound answer. But I (and maybe others too) am curious about your (present and future) position.
>
>It won't be legal for them to release a Visual FoxPro 10 product, but there seems to be no problem in them releasing the VFP Compiler and Extender. They can, of course, come up with more features in their compiler, as they intend to do, indeed.
>
>Just in case someone didn't notice, I did an interview with Samuel David which is in the latest issue of UT Magazine:
>http://www.utmag.com/ViewPageArticle.aspx?Session=4E7273535366646F6757513D20454E4B75793765742F2B33546D664B61366B497A4B773D3D
>
>Regards,

Hi Martin,

thank you for this really great interview. I did a few little tests with the Online-Version of the VFPCompiler and it worked great.

Regards,

Rolf