Hi Martin:
It is good to proceed with caution. We know this is a legitimate concern and we think the next monthly updates of the compiler will show more and more of the real value we can deliver.
We truly believe in what we are doing, and right know We believe there is not better alternative to take the .NET Route that trying our compiler. Any other path would mean a full rewrite of your app.
>>>>>Just in case someone didn't notice, I did an interview with Samuel David which is in the latest issue of UT Magazine:
>>>>>
http://www.utmag.com/ViewPageArticle.aspx?Session=4E7273535366646F6757513D20454E4B75793765742F2B33546D664B61366B497A4B773D3D>>>>
>>>>Yes I noticed, and have read it. It was a good interview, with good questions. Thanks.
>>>
>>>Thanks, Peter. I had the intention on making it longer and go over some more details, but the time was pressing, and I didn't want to let it go to the next issue, on June. Maybe we can schedule a follow-up later to talk about how the product evolve over this year. I know there is a great expectation around, and they are doing a very impressive work so far.
>>
>>Personally, I'm more 'worried' about a *lack* of expectation amongst many. The two of you (you and Samuel David) esp. did a good job because the reader who started with skepticism must have ended reading with a feeling that it *might* be possible and real afterall.
>>
>>I'm still not totally convinced, but am of opinion that the project/product must get a serious chance. And we/they must reconsider what its place will gonna be, now that VFP10 won't ever see the light.
>
>I'm not in a position to depend on this product, and would probably never use it beyond personal interest, but for some of my customers tat might be interested in it, my main concern still is how much support the company can offer. It is not that one-man shops can't handle business well (Rick is an example, although he has his bears helping him), but it is generally harder. For a product of that complexity, I'd like to clearly see a stronger presence before any commitment.
>
>I don't mean the company is not solid. It is just that we don't know very much about them yet.
