>>> Afterall, there is nowhere written, as to my knowledge, that MS promisses
>>> to continue development of .NET for as long as the company will remain
>>> to exist.
>
>Looks to me like you are really trying to find a lot more stability than this entire industry will ever provide. After all, change and advancement is what drives the software business...
Now you've taken my paragraph out of context. I was using it as an argument that those who think .NET (as an example) is a safe haven should not feel too secure about that haven. Afterall, as I understand from people like Craig Berntson, a company owes us not much more than what's promissed in the eula. So, we should take the eula far more serious and not presume things that are not explicitly written.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
