Hi John --

>>
>He's agreed that was a stoopid misguided adventure, one not at all becoming >of an MVP, and we've put that behind us.

Just to be on the record here. My original wording was stupid.
<<

Yep. So was calling folks "ignorant" when they pointed that out to you. Continuing to call them ignorant, misguided, and uninformed for several hundred messages was also both redundant and incorrect.

>>I had the best of intentions in that I wanted to get some questions answered.<<

Flies, honey, vinegar, y'know? Lesson for the future -- when you want people to help you, don't start by telling them how idiotic they are. We're happy to help any recoving Fox-addicts over there, and welcome them with open arms when they truly come to learn.

>>Good strategy of going up there. Bad tactics in the wording.<<

When you're serious, just holler.

>>FWIW, I did get some valuable insights up there.<<

See? We even help out the lame flamers! ;-)

>>As for Koziol, well, here and now - on the UT. I will say it to you Karl - and John...<<

Thanks, but I doubt it will help. The man's as thick as a brick.

>>John, stop going up on the Off.Ramp and getting yourself into flame wars for the sake of flaming. If you want question things - be controversial, fine. But, don't go up there and just lob bombs.<<

Heh, I suppose the "good news," if you can call it that, is that no one bothers to take him seriously. We've always managed to attract our share of kooks over the years, and he fits right into that role. Something about some folks that just drives them towards seeking others' abuse. Go figure, eh?

Later... Karl