Hi Mike --

>>If it was really lame, afaic, and unforgivable, then why did DevX delete the messages?<<

DevX didn't delete anything. I did.

>>They must've found the posting to be highly inappropriate given what they don't delete up there.<<

They weren't necessarily inappropriate, but implied someone said something that he may or may not have actually said, and that person's representatives weren't exactly thrilled with the implication. They were deleted out of simple respect and courtesy, though, hours before this dissatisfaction was voiced.

>>I've got an idea Karl, if you're game. Rather than continuing in this pointless name calling - which I'm not completely attributing towards you - and continued bickering over things that are extremely inconsequential.<<

If the demise of Fox is truly inconsequential, why do you folks keep up the discussion ad nauseum? <vbg>

>>(Although it is very entertaining.)<<

It is, isn't it?

>>Why don't you use some bandwidth by starting a thread on what Fox developers could gain by using VB and what VB has to offer vs. Fox?<<

A future? <gd&r> (Sorry, old habits die hard. ;-)

Happy to field any specific questions, but I'm not here to proselytize. That would, afterall, be considered fairly rude, would it not?

>>This has been discussed here numerous times but primarily by people who know Fox first and VB second. I for one, would be really interested in what you have to say.<<

Fire away.

Later... Karl