>Hi J. --
>
>>>I don't particularly think your replies are that deep, now that you comment on mine.<<
>
>Whatever.
>
>>>As to the flaming, keep in mind where you're trying to take a stand.<<
>
>What "stand" do you think I'm "trying" to take, exactly? Gotta watch out for prejudice, there.
>
>>>You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but the flame elements are all there.<<
>
>And they would be? Seems to me you're the one attacking me for simply coming to visit.
>
>>>Finally, I take it you're referring to John Petersen's visit to the VB forum.<<
>
>He's agreed that was a stoopid misguided adventure, one not at all becoming of an MVP, and we've put that behind us.
>
>Now, if y'all could just reel in the other John, things might settle down. That guy's over there making a boob out of himself daily. Not a pretty reflection, not at all.
>
>>>I don't have an excuse for that.<<
>
>Didn't ask for one. But I am glad to hear the general consensus here is that it was indeed inexcusable. Gives me some reason for hope.
>
>>>I couldn't care less what today's marketing buzzword MS is using on VB.<<
>
>Me either.
>
>Later... Karl

Now don't throw your arms up and go "I didn't do nothing.. I'm the victim here". 'Laughingstock'.. 'misguided'.. 'sad and pathetic' sound familiar? We're all VFPers here (mostly), expect some kind of reply to derogatory remarks like those.