>No one said it wasn't different, but what do you mean in everything? Explain how it's better in data handling than FoxPro. Does .NET have a comparable data handling set of commands and functions to compare with FoxPro yet? I admit that it is getting there and will eventually arrrive.
>
>>If you say so.
>
>>I really think that .NET is vastly different then VFP in just about everything.

Do you want differences between the two or benefits of one vs. the other?

OK, how about how well FP works with ANYTHING else and passing a DATE to any other program in a message, via OOP design?

How about having a group of programmer working on the same project together keeping up with bugs, tasks and fixes?

How about the constant desire to put all code bases into a .dbf style container . Just change the extension per source type, but it's all the same.

2 gig is still a PITA and always will be.

What if the next OS doesn't do the old DOS space?

Shall I continue?

Bad Steve!