Rupert Murdoch's Fox (called Faux by most because they do little to report real news) is the worse problem we have on USA tv. There was a documentary on them several years ago showing how they operate as a mouthpiece for the republican party.

They were ruthless on their attacks on Clinton. Yet the current president can do no wrong. After the start of the Iraq war, when it was proved that there was no WMD in Iraq, and no connection between Saddam and Al Queda, a research institute did a study.

Of those who listed their main news source as other then Fox 15% thought there was WMD and I think a little less thought there was a Saddam/Al Queda connection.

Of those who listed Fox as their main news source, 80% thought WMD existed and a similar percentage thought their was a connection.

Here's a couple clips of one of Fox's main talking heads. You be the judge:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/24/kool-aid-alert-oreilly-unhinged/
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/22/rocky-and-billwinkle/


Not to feed you too many clips, but I think this clip sums up what more and more true Americans think:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/25/bill-maher-traitors-dont-get-to-question-my-patriotism/

There is a certain segment of the population that continues to, and always will go to Fox station for their news. It won't change. But that segment is getting smaller and smaller by the day.




>>>>It's absolutely amazes me. How at that level you can live in such an alternative reality. My guess is that bolton had no understanding of the history of Lincoln whatsoever. But it's engrained in his makeup now, that no understanding of a subject shouldn't stop him from speaking on it.
>>>
>>>I've lived in such a state, and yes, you can live in it, but nobody can force you to like it.
>>>
>>>The alternate reality went so far, that on some days in December of 1996, Sloba's TV Bastille (aka state TV, Channel 1) would report of heavy fog in Belgrade, and you'd see the buildings downtown... from third floor up. Below, there were anywhere between 100 and 200 thousand people demonstrating against stolen elections, but you wouldn't see them on TV. His politicians were sometimes mentioning the protests (which lasted for some 88 days in a row, with attendance varying between 80 and 500 thousand) as "a handful of malcontents". Later, I've seen a picture of about 20000 people (as much as can fit a front page of a largish book while still having some recognizable faces), with a large slogan "here comes a handful".
>>>
>>>Fortunately for us, some time by the end of 1999 the West stopped helping him.
>>
>>
>>Sounds like the way the MSM reports on conservatives! Then Cindy Sheehan has a gathering of 9 people and they report massive crowds.
>
>So what are the US people going to about it ?? I can't imagine they are proud of getting those people poluting politics with lies, ignorant and selfish all knowing attitude ??