>>Craig says in the other thread that C# Team don't want the language to get polluted in exchange for not having the so called productivity feature which is around in VB.Net. So the VB Team decided to go the other route which means VB.Net is a polluted language but implemented the productivity feature.
>>
>>VFPers, where do you want to go today: to the polluted one or the pure language?
>>
>>I am a VFP fanatic so I'll not go with its enemy eversince - polluted VB.Net. Go pure C#.Net! :)
>
>You don't think that .NET is the only alternative to VFP, do you?

I don't Hilmar. You can go with Java and other technologies like I have heard that Phython is also a good choice. We decided to go and continue with MS technologies. And therefore .NET is the way to go but ofcourse with a long term strategy that's why we embraces C# so that in any case, we can go with it's C language cousins - java and the like.