Did a message get deleted or something? I read John's post (on the media suggesting huge crowds at events which were in fact attended by relatively small numbers and he was correct) and your response doesn't make any sense. Why so vicious and why such an attack? Your response is totally out of line with John's post unless you were actually responding to another message I couldn't see?





>Please John elighten us to the facts here. I just wasn't aware of this "fact". Of course I don't watch faux news also. And I'm sure you get you info from your good pal o'reilly.
>
>i'm also extremely curious how you justify your believes in "we better attack them first" with your supposed strong religious believes. I saw an interview with a nun after the start of the Iraqi war and she discussed how people like you aren't her Christians. Her Christians are taught to help the poor and needy. While people like you say you have such strong feelings on abortion. Yet you cheer at all the bombs dropped in Iraq. And have no feelings of remorse for all the children killed by the US military.
>
>I was also reading about the effects of the trade embargos forced on Iraq after the first Gulf war. Estimates of the number of children that died due to the embargo range from 300,000 to 700,000. But I guess with you it's okay cause they're Muslims anyways. And they don't believe in your God.
>
>
>>>>It's absolutely amazes me. How at that level you can live in such an alternative reality. My guess is that bolton had no understanding of the history of Lincoln whatsoever. But it's engrained in his makeup now, that no understanding of a subject shouldn't stop him from speaking on it.
>>>
>>>I've lived in such a state, and yes, you can live in it, but nobody can force you to like it.
>>>
>>>The alternate reality went so far, that on some days in December of 1996, Sloba's TV Bastille (aka state TV, Channel 1) would report of heavy fog in Belgrade, and you'd see the buildings downtown... from third floor up. Below, there were anywhere between 100 and 200 thousand people demonstrating against stolen elections, but you wouldn't see them on TV. His politicians were sometimes mentioning the protests (which lasted for some 88 days in a row, with attendance varying between 80 and 500 thousand) as "a handful of malcontents". Later, I've seen a picture of about 20000 people (as much as can fit a front page of a largish book while still having some recognizable faces), with a large slogan "here comes a handful".
>>>
>>>Fortunately for us, some time by the end of 1999 the West stopped helping him.
>>
>>
>>Sounds like the way the MSM reports on conservatives! Then Cindy Sheehan has a gathering of 9 people and they report massive crowds.