Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
VFP is not a modern language?
Message
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Visual FoxPro et .NET
Divers
Thread ID:
01208560
Message ID:
01208581
Vues:
17
>>Interesting opinion:
>>
>>http://www.vbdotnetforums.com/showthread.php?s=6a1bb7be690854a7dda5d4bacd25fb9a&p=55640#post55640
>
>We have a saying here "One grand-ma knows, one grand-ma speaks".
>
>OK, no built-in multithreading but it can be done. No strong typing compiler, but this gives you many possibilities. I would ask him where is built-in MACRO execution in VB.NET? and if he want so much "MODERN" language why he stick with VB.NET. Why he not use ASSEMBLER or C++ or even C#? I hate such a "GURUS". When I saw them over the forums I just ignore them, because if I should answer them I would be banned very soon :-)
>
>Right tool for the right job, no other therms. I could use a hammer to drive a screw, but with screw-driver it would be better.
>If that .... goes to China will he speak Japanese because Japanese it MORE modern (or vice-versa)?
>And why He thing that VB.NET is not a botch in the NET platform? I think VB.NET is there just because MS starts with BASIC. If not, no such a language will be there.
>Thiese is just my thoughts of course, I have nothing against VB.NET (or any other language), but when I hear something like that I want to curse :-)

Hey, Borislav...

This for you: http://community.webshots.com/album/97430078FaAQHn

Hope you feel better!

:) :) :)
Ivan
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform